POPULATION VS ECONOMY
The debate
of population and economy dates back to Malthus. According to Malthus with
increasing economic growth population increases with higher fertility and lower
mortality. On the other hand increasing population under constant input such as
land translates into lower marginal productivities and thereby reducing
economic growth. This theory created quite a stir in England in the 19th
century but the population and the economy continued to increase proving the
Malthus theory to be wrong.
As we have
seen that the various results of the demographic transition models pertaining
to mortality and birth rate are directly linked to per capita income of a
nation rather than aggregate output. Here when addressing, the often asked
question is the suffiency of the
food grains for the population. This as the economists observe is a question of
whether the people can buy rather than the whether adequate presence of food grains.
When people earn money they could import food grains from various developing
countries selling them.
Another
question of how population increase would pressurise institutions like
education and intensify the foreign exchange constraints by placing more
pressure on balance of payment. Here the concerns are about how the pressure
would result in the fall in standards of education which would end in fewer
enrolments and drop outs are very true in a developing country like India.
But what
higher working population would result is a very large labour force with less
minimum wage and thus encouraging labour based industries.This larger labour
force would result in economic development of country and also reduces the
problem of unemployement.According to demographic transition model every
country has this window of opportunity called demographic dividend.
“The demographic dividend is a window
of opportunity in the development of a society or nation that opens up as
fertility rates decline when faster rates of economic growth and human
development are possible when combined with effective policies and markets. The
drop in fertility rates often follows significant reductions in child and
infant mortality rates, as well as an increase in average life expectancy. As
women and families realize that fewer children will die during infancy or
childhood they will begin to have fewer children to reach their desired number
of offspring. However, this drop in fertility rates is not immediate. The lag
between produces a generational population bulge that surges through society.
For a period of time this “bulge” is a burden on society and increases the dependency ratio. Eventually this group begins
to enter the productive labor force. With fertility rates continuing to fall
and older generations having shorter life expectancies, the dependency ratio
declines dramatically. This demographic shift initiates the demographic
dividend.”
India’s
population is expected to cross China’s population in 2025.Most of this
population is going to be in working age group resulting in the demographic
dividend for India. Though this provides a window of opportunity of
development,It also challenges us of how India will be able to provide basic
food and water to all it’s population.
There are
four stages of development in demographic dividend. First the increased labour supply.
Though this is dependent on how government will be able to grasp available work
force. Next the increase in savngs.As the number of dependents decrease there
will be an increase in saving resulting in the economic boost. Next is the
increase in the human capital. As there are less children parents invest more
on each resulting in better education and health outcomes. And finally is the
growth in domestic demand due to increased per capita income and less
dependency ratio.
As we can
see that the first mechanism is a root for a countries development during
demographic divedend.So government has to come up with policies that would
increase the opportunity of employment with which there could be a social chaos.
The Right To Education Act is definitely one policies towards the right
direction if implemented properly.
Indian Case:
he
International Labour Organisation has predicted that by 2020, India will have
116 million workers in the age bracket of 20 to 24 years, as compared to
China’s 94 million. This demographic fact has the potential to be the biggest
competitive advantage of India in the years to come.
As we know
that education is of utmost importance and since adapting adopting RTE, we have
achieved a gross enrolment ratio (GER) in primary education of 104 per cent.
The challenge, however, is sustaining these rates of enrolment into higher
education. In that arena, we stand nowhere near the global GER of 29 per cent,
with a historically low GER, currently at 18 per cent.
And so to
tackle the question of employement, Government of India has proposed to create
100 million jobs by 2022 in its 12th five year plan.